4 ms·

Really? I'm not saying AWS doesn't offer anything over bare servers, but do people think it's a Hubble to their home printers?

yani 8y ago
Yes. AWS is that awesome with the number of different and sophisticated services that they offer. Azure is probably the only other cloud that comes close. DigitalOcean is cheap, unreliable, and the amount of services being offered can be counted on the fingers of my one hand. I can talk about the issues there are with DO on a daily basis. Once you are past MVP, your business needs a better home.
- stanmancan 8y ago
  I would love to hear more about the issues you’ve experienced with DO. We have been using them more and more lately and have had a much better experience there than on AWS, GCP, or Linode.
manigandham 8y ago
That's a bad analogy but yes, AWS is a vast portfolio of services to solve your problems. If all you need are some bare-metal servers and nothing else then you really don't need AWS in the first place and are paying a premium for stuff you're not using.
- qaq 8y ago
  They have a vast portfolio of services to solve resume driven architectures problem. The scale at which you outgrow 2 modern high end load balanced boxes is something 99% of the projects will never achieve. There are legitimate use cases for cloud services but what majority of projects are using them for is not it. Reminds me of service at FB that issues and processes data from roughly several hundred million requests per day runs on a single box and is a regular python app. 99% of startups would implement same thing as some data processing pipeline with kafka, spark , hadoop or whatever else is "absolutely critical" to have to process 1/1000 the size of data.
qes 8y ago
It's a bit of a stretch, but yeah there's a pretty vast difference between AWS or Azure and DigitalOcean.

4 ms·

Really? I'm not saying AWS doesn't offer anything over bare servers, but do people think it's a Hubble to their home printers?

by lultimouomo 8y ago

yani 8y ago
Yes. AWS is that awesome with the number of different and sophisticated services that they offer. Azure is probably the only other cloud that comes close. DigitalOcean is cheap, unreliable, and the amount of services being offered can be counted on the fingers of my one hand. I can talk about the issues there are with DO on a daily basis. Once you are past MVP, your business needs a better home.
- stanmancan 8y ago
  I would love to hear more about the issues you’ve experienced with DO. We have been using them more and more lately and have had a much better experience there than on AWS, GCP, or Linode.
manigandham 8y ago
That's a bad analogy but yes, AWS is a vast portfolio of services to solve your problems. If all you need are some bare-metal servers and nothing else then you really don't need AWS in the first place and are paying a premium for stuff you're not using.
- qaq 8y ago
  They have a vast portfolio of services to solve resume driven architectures problem. The scale at which you outgrow 2 modern high end load balanced boxes is something 99% of the projects will never achieve. There are legitimate use cases for cloud services but what majority of projects are using them for is not it. Reminds me of service at FB that issues and processes data from roughly several hundred million requests per day runs on a single box and is a regular python app. 99% of startups would implement same thing as some data processing pipeline with kafka, spark , hadoop or whatever else is "absolutely critical" to have to process 1/1000 the size of data.
qes 8y ago
It's a bit of a stretch, but yeah there's a pretty vast difference between AWS or Azure and DigitalOcean.