3 ms·
That's the sort of thing a detective would work out relatively quickly though. If you share none of your mother's DNA, the only possible explanation would be ad
by bilbo0s 8y ago
That's the sort of thing a detective would work out relatively quickly though. If you share none of your mother's DNA, the only possible explanation would be adoption. And if your mother, for whatever reason, told the detective you were not adopted. Then that detective would have their suspect.
So if you tried that, the stranger would have to be a very carefully selected family member in any case. Someone from your mother's side, same gender, not likely to submit his/her DNA, AND not likely to be in DNA databases already due to prior arrests. (Also, it goes without saying that they can't be adopted.)
But even taking all these precautions, I'm pretty sure a detective would still work it all out.
- bradyd 8y ago> If you share none of your mother's DNA, the only possible explanation would be adoption. Not necessarily. There was a case where a DNA test of a woman's children showed that they did not share any of her DNA. Social Services was threatening to take them away from her. When she had another child, they court ordered an officer to be present during the birth and collect DNA from both of them at that time. Even still the DNA "proved" she was not the mother. It was only after another similar case was discovered that they were able to determine that she was a chimera, basically that she was her own twin, and had two different DNA strands. https://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/shes-twin/story?id=2315693 https://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/shes-twin/story?id=2315693
- bilbo0s 8y agoYeah, but if your mother is not a chimera, they're gonna nail you right out of the box unless the fake DNA comes from a member of your mother's side of the family.