3 ms·
Snowden was definitely an agent. Agency? Jury's out. There's a difference between being effective, GW, TJ, and stupidly ineffective, JA, RS. Or just plain stup
by dosy 7y ago
Snowden was definitely an agent. Agency? Jury's out.
There's a difference between being effective, GW, TJ, and stupidly ineffective, JA, RS. Or just plain stupid, ES.
Interesting about DJB, I did not know that story.
- AnaniasAnanas 7y agoHow was Snowden "plain stupid" exactly? "stupidly ineffective" - well, one has to start from somewhere. Plus stallman's work was far from ineffective. As for assange's work, the publication of the war crimes might have saved thousands of civilian lives.
- dosy 7y agoSnowden was a pawn, taken in by savior complex. Stallman made zero impact. Assange had no effect on war policy. He was also a pawn entrapped by savior complex.