3 ms·
Phones have legitimate uses in cars. Satnav, music, or even just an indication that you just pull over and answer a phone. Given that I've never used one illega
by kurtisc 7y ago
Phones have legitimate uses in cars. Satnav, music, or even just an indication that you just pull over and answer a phone. Given that I've never used one illegally, I think it's fair for me not to want to go through a power cycle for every journey.
How could Uber work without one?
- ehnto 7y agoThe utility for devices in a car is obvious, no one is arguing that they aren't useful. But that's just a shame, because using them kills people every day and we haven't found a way to police it yet. Power cycling may just be a caveat of the policing methods. Driving is a privilege that is constantly abused. Perhaps we just couldn't handle unfettered use of devices in cars the same way we couldn't handle drinking and driving? I am all for some kind of controlled way of safe phone use in cars, but it doesn't exist. Better to remove the temptation until it does.
- mgamache 7y agoThat sentiment can be made about a lot of things including cars themselves: "The utility for cars are obvious, using them kills people every day. We just couldn't handle unfettered use of cars. I am all for some kind of controlled way of safe use of cars, but it doesn't exist. Better to remove the temptation until it does."
- ehnto 7y agoSure, but not about the downsides of removing them. It's a balance of pros and cons. Having people stop using their phones at all in a car wouldn't be a huge deal. It is only a recent problem after all. Not having the automobile would be devastating to the economy and people's lifestyles. The pros of phone use in a car are real, but shallow. The cons are that they cause accidents. It's heavily weighted toward cons.