3 ms·
An url shortener would benefit more from a naked domain than from SSL. * Not that I am working on one, just that you never know the poster intentions.
by Kilimanjaro 16y ago
An url shortener would benefit more from a naked domain than from SSL.
* Not that I am working on one, just that you never know the poster intentions.
- joshu 16y agoOh god no more URL shorteners. I hate the www thing too. The explanation is that you cannot have a cname on a root domain. They coud get around e problem by just hosting dns for you themselves. The other issue is that you end up having t have yet another service to redirect dom.ain to www.dom.ain as well. Sometimes dns providers will do this, but not always. (Dotster doesn't do the right thing, for example.)