>It should be assumed everything can and will fail. And anything still seemingly working to spec over a fairly conservative cycle count has already failed. Jus

>It should be assumed everything can and will fail. And anything still seemingly working to spec over a fairly conservative cycle count has already failed. Just in ingenious ways that it hasn't yet informed you of and nobody has yet discovered. You should probably swap it out for a spare and take it apart and hit it with things till you are sure. You should probably do that now while there is still time.