3 ms·
You're arguing that in order to solve world hunger, we should have fewer people that need feeding, instead of automating farming for higher output.
by warkdarrior 8y ago
You're arguing that in order to solve world hunger, we should have fewer people that need feeding, instead of automating farming for higher output.
- alexashka 8y agoIt's not an either/or argument. It's an 'and' argument of autonomous cars are great, AND many believe do not solve the problems that many proponents of autonomous cars think they will. In regards to world hunger - many of this planet's woes, would be helped by advancements in science, agriculture AND not endlessly having children.