5 ms·
I'm impressed by the paper's 16 co-first authors and 13 co-last corresponding authors. While something like this might be more routine in a field like physics,
by mxwsn 7y ago
I'm impressed by the paper's 16 co-first authors and 13 co-last corresponding authors. While something like this might be more routine in a field like physics, it's a good look for biology and I hope the trend of sharing credit continues.
- mruts 7y agoI got coauthored for formatting my coworker’s paper with LateX in the field of computational biology. So don’t get too excited.
- dcdanko 7y agoThe standards for authorship in this study were pretty strict. Something like ~2 supplementary figures just for a co-authorship. Source: I'm in one of the labs on this paper (but not one of the authors)