4 ms·
NYC only became a cultural and financial center in the last century. The core Western cultural hub has been moving around over the last couple centuries - Vienn
by heurist 8y ago
NYC only became a cultural and financial center in the last century. The core Western cultural hub has been moving around over the last couple centuries - Vienna, Paris, NYC, now arguably SF. It's not impossible for another to rise in this century. I could easily see two world cultural centers reflecting the divide in underlying cultural polarities (conformism vs. individualism, etc). China as the epicenter for a new pole makes sense, though stifled speech may affect it. Maybe a diverse satellite, like Hong Kong or Bangkok. (I haven't visited Asia so I don't have a good grasp of dynamics there).
- notfromhere 8y agoSan Francisco is not a cultural hub. Cultural products still largely come out of two places: LA and NYC. edit: anyone downvoting, feel free to defend what makes SF the cultural hub for western civilization.
- heurist 8y agoTechnological and social impact. SV owns the west's attention and behavior right now. I do not consider art to be the only cultural artifact. OP in this thread actually included financial impact in its consideration of NYC. Technology is as much a cultural factor as finance.
- seppin 8y ago> Technological and social impact. That's what makes SF a financial capital. What are its cultural contributions? Hoodies and overpriced coffee? > SV owns the west's attention and behavior right now Tech acts to capture and reflect culture, it doesn't create any. Even if it did, having companies based in SF wouldn't make the city itself a cultural capital. Just economic.
- notfromhere 8y agoIt's an ironic claim given how tech has driven out all the creative types out of SF
- heurist 8y agoI feel that you are being overly reductive. My midwestern parents spend half their evenings on Facebook with Netflix on in the background now instead of simply watching cable TV. Society is having huge, diffuse discussions around overuse of phones, internet addiction, political problems of connectivity. Most of the popular personal entertainment apps are based in SV (as is Pixar, if you want to discuss influential art). Culture is not paintings and sculptures, it's the way we behave and interact. Consider that prior to Da Vinci's era, painting primarily was seen as a trade and not an art. With technology uprooting our society piece by piece, I see no reason to consider technology anything but a core cultural driver. SV is currently the center of technology-based culture, for better or worse.
- seppin 8y ago> My midwestern parents spend half their evenings on Facebook with Netflix on in the background now instead of simply watching cable TV. Then your argument is for LA creating culture, which it does, not SF. "Tech" distributes art created in Hollywood. > Society is having huge, diffuse discussions around overuse of phones, internet addiction, political problems of connectivity. Again not culture, digital addiction if anything. The cigarettes of our generation. > Culture is not paintings and sculptures, it's the way we behave and interact. Communication tools are just that, tools. Speech, performance, art, music, all creations that have nothing to do with the tech that distributes it. > SV is currently the center of technology-based culture, for better or worse. SF/SV captures, repackages, and distributes art/speech in order to sell ads over the top of it all. Why you think that qualifies as creating culture itself, I don't know. You think i'm wrong? Try watching a Youtube or Facebook original series. When SV tries to actually create something, it's terrible.
- chihuahua 8y agoJuicero was invented there, if that doesn't qualify it as a cultural hub, I don't know what will ! /s
- dredmorbius 8y agoAdd Rome to your list. Ngrams of the most-frequently-mentioned cities in print (skewed by an English-heavy corpus) are interesting. An arbitrary listing here, with long-tem smothing (20 years) due to pre-1750 data variaability: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=London%2CParis%2CRome%2CNew+York%2CTokyo%2CMadrid&year_start=1500&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=20&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CLondon%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CParis%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CRome%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CNew%20York%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CTokyo%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CMadrid%3B%2Cc0 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=London%2CParis...
- heurist 8y agoHad Rome in the list but removed it because I felt I was missing one or two in between it and Vienna. Rome and Florence dominated for a long time. Culture also used to be more distributed and heterogeneous prior to industrialization.
- dredmorbius 8y agoDepending on how far back you want to go: Rome, Byzantium and other near-east locations, Cordova and Teledo, Florence and the Italian City-States, Vienna, Paris, London, Amsterdam, ... The list actually seems fairly small. Hrm: listing of largest European cities through history 9sortable tables): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_European_cities_in_history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_European_citie... And worldwide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_cities_throughout_history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_cities_through... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_urban_community_sizes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_urban_community_siz...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]