> The author keeps saying 'my data' when the data isn't theirs. The fact that they interacted with a party, that interaction, and who you are, is thier data. "

> The author keeps saying 'my data' when the data isn't theirs. The fact that they interacted with a party, that interaction, and who you are, is thier data. "My data" might be ambiguous, because it can imply both ownership and association, but in this case obviously means "personal data concerning me". > This the simple minded use of 'my data' really wrecks what could be a rather interesting ( but not surprising ) piece. Try to read it again, this time without assuming the least favorable interpretation you can think of.