3 ms·
> Cambridge also seems to have a disproportionate number of unsafe bicyclists (and pedestrians) for some reason. There's a certain "vicious cycle" element to t
by wool_gather 8y ago
> Cambridge also seems to have a disproportionate number of unsafe bicyclists (and pedestrians) for some reason.
There's a certain "vicious cycle" element to this. If bicycling generally appears unsafe, then mostly (over)confident, risk-tolerant people will do it. Those are the same people who are comfortable getting away with unwise things like running stoplights the wrong way at dusk on their no-brakes fixie with a single tiny red blinkie mounted high on their messenger bag. ;)
It's also tied into a common argument against biking infrastructure: "Why would we build this? There aren't any people biking now." Chicken-egg, but there are many people who won't bike if it seems unsafe. And those people have a good chance of behaving more sensibly when they are convinced to ride.
- just_steve_h 8y agoRight. The argument "not that many bikes, why build bike lanes?" is a bit like "nobody crosses the river on a raft, so why build a bridge?"