3 ms·
AWS's new Glacier Deep is actually cheaper than Google's Ice Cold, $1/TB/month. https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/03/S3-glacier-deep-archive/ htt
by mmahemoff 8y ago
AWS's new Glacier Deep is actually cheaper than Google's Ice Cold, $1/TB/month.
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/03/S3-glacier-deep-archive/ https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/03/S3-glacie...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jhack 8y agoThose retrieval costs, though...
- tedmiston 8y agoAnyone know the retrieval cost for Ice Cold? I don't see it mentioned in the post.
- pnutjam 8y agoIf it's the same as their other storage, which isn't really clear... About $50 /TB
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- shittyadmin 8y agoOn B2 that's $10... yeah, might be reconsidering this...
- m3nu 8y agoI expect that Google will also charge for retrieval. Their egress is really really expensive. There may also be a minimum storage period, like Amazon has. Let's wait and see.
- puzzle 8y agoIt looks like a lower tier than the existing Coldline and Nearline (7x cheaper for storage than the former). Both have a minimum period, so this one is likely to have one as well. Coldline and Nearline are more expensive than regular storage when fetching objects, which means ice cold storage is probably even more expensive when you restore (is it going to be 7x, too, keeping symmetry?).
- Hamuko 8y agoIs their egress more expensive than Amazon's? Because when I had a look at that, it sure wasn't cheap either.