> With non-realism, we are restricted to something we know to exist, by virtue of our human experience: our first-person perception of things. Take that to it'

> With non-realism, we are restricted to something we know to exist, by virtue of our human experience: our first-person perception of things. Take that to it's logical extreme and you end up with solipsism. Why suppose anything else exists other than your own first person perceptions in this moment? If you allow for other first person perceptions which you don't experience yourself, then why not a world of space and time for those experiences to exist inside of with bodies and everything else that constitutes or supports our first person perceptions?