4 ms·
This paper[1] gets at it for one. From the abstract: " Consistent with the importance of exposure effects in career selection, women and disadvantaged youth a
by cwal37 8y ago
This paper[1] gets at it for one.
From the abstract:
" Consistent with the importance of exposure effects in career selection, women and disadvantaged youth are as underrepresented among high-impact inventors as they are among inventors as a whole. These findings suggest that there are many “lost Einsteins”—individuals who would have had highly impactful inventions had they been exposed to innovation in childhood—especially among women, minorities, and children from low-income families."
[1] https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/134/2/647/5218522?redirectedFrom=fulltext https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/134/2/647/5218...
- koalala 8y agoThis is easily explained by the difference in IQ distributions between men and women. The IQ distribution for men has fatter tails on both sides, so more very high and very low IQ individuals, where as the one for women doesn't.