3 ms·
That's ridiculous reasoning, if there was evidence he could be convicted without ever being interviewed or being present.
by the_duke 8y ago
That's ridiculous reasoning, if there was evidence he could be convicted without ever being interviewed or being present.
- stefanfisk 8y agoThey can’t convict without a trial, and they can’t get a trial until they have Assange in custody or if he agrees to a trial via an intermediary.
- the_duke 8y agoTIL: some European countries allow a trial in absentia, some don't. Do you have a reference that they are not possible in Sweden? I can't find anything either way.
- icebraining 8y agoEven if they're possible, the fact that they haven't chosen to do so doesn't mean they don't have evidence. What would the point be anyway? They have to get custody to actually enforce any possible sentence.