3 ms·
If he’s likely to face the death penalty, then he has an excellent legal defence against extradition. If he’d left earlier, he’d have had a chance to appeal to
by peteretep 8y ago
If he’s likely to face the death penalty, then he has an excellent legal defence against extradition.
If he’d left earlier, he’d have had a chance to appeal to the ECJ too. Ooops
- threeseed 8y agoBrexit has been extended to October and it's very likely it won't happen at all. Or that UK would be subject to ECJ anyway.
- peteretep 8y ago> it's very likely it won't happen at all I mean I really hope you're right, but betting markets have odds on that at about 30%, which for me doesn't count as "very likely" > Brexit has been extended to October The English legal system moves sloooooooowly. I mean not third-world slowly, but the McKinnon case had what, a decade in it? > Or that UK would be subject to ECJ anyway. As a sibling comment noted, I was wrong to talk about the ECJ, when the ECHR is what's important. Interesting to see how that thrashes out post-Brexit.
- tareqak 8y agoThe UK hasn’t left the EU yet and just negotiated the extension to Brexit to October 31 of this year at the latest. I don’t see why Assange wouldn’t be able to appeal now unless his case never gets there before Brexit.
- chki 8y agoThis is not about the ECJ but he could instead appeal to the ECHR, which the UK is still a party to even if there was a Brexit.