3 ms·
I'm not sure that graph shows what you think it shows. That graph shows that there's an obnoxiously large number of websites that don't support something that
by r3bl 8y ago
I'm not sure that graph shows what you think it shows.
That graph shows that there's an obnoxiously large number of websites that don't support something that there's zero reason not to support.
It costs $0 and takes maybe half an hour to implement, browsers are screaming "not secure" to each visitor, and one in five websites still don't support it. "Make websites faster", on top of being vague, is way more difficult to implement.
- piva00 8y ago1 in 5 NOT supporting it is much better than the opposite when I started working in the web where 90+% of websites didn't support HTTPS.
- StreamBright 8y agoWell, I like the percentages and the direction that the graph is heading.