3 ms·
That also runs counter to the popular narrative that wealthy families only grow wealthier.
by skookumchuck 8y ago
That also runs counter to the popular narrative that wealthy families only grow wealthier.
- jessaustin 8y agoThe children of billionaires (like this guy) are, on average, wealthier than the children of truck drivers.
- jumbopapa 8y agoThis is true, but at the end of the day most wealth created in the US at least is first generational. It's not uncommon for a family fortune to be lost in 2-3 generations.
- yardie 8y agoI can think of not a single family who started out wealthy and lost it all. What's far more common is dilution of wealth. Start out with $100mm, split that 10 ways through inheritance, then split that again, and again. The Rockefellers, Carnegies, Mellons and Westinghouses still exist, just under many different surnames.
- jumbopapa 8y agoMost families never reach that level of wealth. It's obviously going to be different for the top .001% of wealth.
- yardie 8y agoIf you start out even with $100k inheritance you're pretty far ahead already. That's enough to get an education, buy a home, or start a business. If you can turn that $100k into $1mm you can draw off $35k for the rest of your life without lifting a finger. Having modest savings and being in good health makes you much closer to wealth than if you were further down the economic chain.
- logfromblammo 8y agoOr the Waltons and Pritzkers, who can split the fortune 12 different ways and still have multiple billionaire scions.