3 ms·
Sure they did — partnerships and whitelists. Is that what you would prefer?
by slumos 8y ago
Sure they did — partnerships and whitelists. Is that what you would prefer?
- justAnotherNET 8y agoyes. AMP links are garbage on mobile, the very thing they're supposed to be good at. I want the real website, and I'm using your search engine to find it. I don't want your terrible broken version of it that I'm going break out of anyways. Tell me, how much time/data did you save me when I have to reload the real page AFTER the broken piece of garbage you sent me the first time? None. At least now you have the original link button. For a good while you had to manually extract the real url from the address bar. It's a complete joke
- tyingq 8y agoI believe AMP to be a sort of trojan horse that leads to a fragmented internet. A way for Google to have some degree of a walled web garden. So yes...I'd prefer almost anything else. If you're signing a contract to be part of it, at least you know what is happening, and can read the terms.
- JohnFen 8y agoYes. Since I automatically ignore anything in the carousel anyway, I'd much prefer that AMP be nonexistent regardless of what that means for the carousel.