Essentially, this is the DMCA for terrorist content. With a somewhat short time requirement driven by some recent events (New Zealand being the most prominent,

Essentially, this is the DMCA for terrorist content. With a somewhat short time requirement driven by some recent events (New Zealand being the most prominent, but not first). Here's a link to the current EU draft: https://www.laquadrature.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019/04/Terr-Reg-LIBE-Final-Compromises.pdf https://www.laquadrature.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019... (It's a document highlighting the latest changes from committee, making it somewhat hard to read but not less interesting) I'm not sure if it's fair to compare notices from the current program, which sends out notices without any legal force, to what this envisages. The directive sets out a process and requirements for notices, including detailed reasoning for each. It also specifically mentions avenues to protest (and sue) in cases of disagreements. I'm no particular fan of this for both practical and philosophical reasons. If youtube had invested in some sort of oversight that prevented this kiwi neckbeard from live-streaming his massacre of innocents, the vote this week would probably have ended differently.