4 ms·
The headline makes it sound like they did work to improve the performance of count(*) in the postgres code, when that's not at all what the article is about. T
by shay_ker 8y ago
The headline makes it sound like they did work to improve the performance of count(*) in the postgres code, when that's not at all what the article is about.
This post from Citus is far more informative:
https://www.citusdata.com/blog/2016/10/12/count-performance/ https://www.citusdata.com/blog/2016/10/12/count-performance/
- pkmishra 8y ago+1. Citusdata article is much better.