3 ms·
>Not really. Once trademarks become "things", that trademark ceases to be effective and can rarely be enforced. TLD's are not for trademarks. This isn't complic
by ryanlol 8y ago
>Not really. Once trademarks become "things", that trademark ceases to be effective and can rarely be enforced. TLD's are not for trademarks. This isn't complicated.
Amazon (the company) has a very (probably the most) legitimate claim to the gTLD as the word is most often used to refer to the company. I'm not really sure that there's any need to bring trademarks into this.
>This should be your sign that you're just grasping at straws and you're not here to learn or make any kind of substantial argument.
It's literally the exact argument you made. I suppose this would mean that you're also grasping at straws, maybe we should start some kind of a club?
- kadendogthing 8y ago>It's literally the exact argument you made. No it isn't. What plane of confusion are you on? I literally tried to describe this with shapes and you couldn't grasp it apparently.
- ryanlol 8y agoI think you need to take a break. Your .apple example was pretty silly, nobody else wanted that TLD. Why should Apple not get to have it if they’re the only ones who want to pay a fuckload of money for it?