3 ms·
The airgap question comes up every time an industrial system is attacked. The thing is that these days all systems are connected via several layers to the outsi
by thesimp 8y ago
The airgap question comes up every time an industrial system is attacked. The thing is that these days all systems are connected via several layers to the outside world. Because a modern oil refinery is of no use if you cannot track what product is being made at that moment. And the people tracking the data are often in completely different locations or even different countries.
The main line of defense is these days is "layers of an onion" network with (physical) controls such that data easily can get out to a higher layer but that it is very difficult to get in from a higher layer back down into a deeper layer.
A completely airgapped network is not practical anymore because the alternative is even worse: nobody wants to have dozens or 100ths of operators, maintenance engineers and 3rd party contractors running around the facility with usb sticks because there is no network to move stuff around. If you have a network then you can control where the data comes into your network, who copies the data to where and what data is visible for which user.
- waste_monk 7y agoIt constantly horrifies me that they don't use data diodes for this systems like this. Let data flow one way from the secure industrial equipment out to the general use network for monitoring, but you'd still have to go to a machine on the secure side to make any changes.
- justwalt 7y agoThis seems to be the best solution by far.