The document itself seems to have been written by an AI doggedly determined to use a limited conference vocabulary, from template sentences, and drop names and

The document itself seems to have been written by an AI doggedly determined to use a limited conference vocabulary, from template sentences, and drop names and subjects in lists so they can be very name-droppy, non-sequitir-expressy and hot-linky. Even the questions (search for ?) are templatey. It's weird. Jump around to a random spot and mentally parse a paragraph. Glance at the one before and after and see if a question forms in your mind: "Why (do you, did you, would you bother to) say that?" ... the next paragraph is has no answer, just more of the same. Perhaps I have just awakened from a dream world of simple actions and visceral experience to discover another world of human termites that only communicate with vague chemical signals. Maybe the limited vocabulary describes chemiistry and these people attend conferences so they can sniff one another.