3 ms·
This makes a lot of sense, the question though is whether or not Sundar can make a policy decision that Larry and Sergey disagree with. (not a business decision
by ChuckMcM 8y ago
This makes a lot of sense, the question though is whether or not Sundar can make a policy decision that Larry and Sergey disagree with. (not a business decision, but a policy like "bringing back bottled water" or something like that).
Were I still there, I would be wondering if there would be a quarterly "Alphabet LMT (Last Month, Today)" where people from all the letters could mingle and ask questions of Larry and Sergey.
It would provide both transparency for the conglomeration and a chance for people to compare notes about how things are done in the other business units.
- logicx24 8y agoBottled water is back, and has been back for a while :) That said, I agree. I think a wider town hall on all of Alphabet would be great, and would help employees see how all the pieces fit into a larger strategy.
- gketuma 8y agoWhat is bottled water? Are you referring to a project at google or just plain ol drinking water?
- dilyevsky 8y agoIt’s kind of silly but there was a big controversy at google nearly decade ago when facilities stopped stocking bottled water in the fridges. I know... not as bad as “free tibet” cake tho...
- manfredo 8y agoThis must be a "thing" at lots of companies. At mine there was a surprisingly heated thread about getting rid of bottled water, which culminated with the founder and CEO telling everyone to shut up and go back to work (albeit in a more respectful wording, and it had gotten to the point where such action was warranted). The thread essentially became legend.
- ChuckMcM 8y agoIt's a ex-Google (xoogler) inside joke from a certain period in time (circa 2009). Similarly with the Free Tibet Goji Berry cake. Basically examples of decisions which the rank and file had a hard time with but were implemented anyway.
- icelancer 8y agoA real question is: Can Sundar unilaterally choose to withdraw business from China that is contingent on agreeing to things that are violations of human rights?