3 ms·
> it's not about definition of A and B, it's about structure of the sentence I agree! And the structure of the argument is fundamentally invalid. > there is n
by village-idiot 8y ago
> it's not about definition of A and B, it's about structure of the sentence
I agree! And the structure of the argument is fundamentally invalid.
> there is no need to do this dance of yours with logic and fallacies
... Oh, I guess we don't agree.
> it's really a truism
"I don't have an argument, but I believe it very strongly".
> you are trying to confuse people and/or push some agenda
Accusing those who disagree with you of pushing an "agenda" is both a bad argument and bad etiquette. Stop.
- keymone 8y ago> Accusing those who disagree with you but you don't just disagree, you make convoluted invalid arguments. there is no logical fallacy in > if maintaining fiat value requires spending resources then not having to maintain fiat value means there is no need to spend resources to maintain fiat value it's indeed a case of: > "I don't have an argument, but I believe it very strongly". but on your part.