3 ms·
> One is the glaring typo--1985 instead of 1965 They've actually accidentally swapped the 1980 and 1985 labels. See fig. 3b on page 25 of https://www.psc.isr.u
by Luc 8y ago
> One is the glaring typo--1985 instead of 1965
They've actually accidentally swapped the 1980 and 1985 labels. See fig. 3b on page 25 of https://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr13-801.pdf https://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr13-801.pdf
- rayiner 8y agoThat doesn't make sense either, because then the equal-sized segments go 1980 to 1985 (5-year gap), 1985 to 1995 (10-year gap).
- Luc 8y agoUgh, sorry, I confused the situation even more with my wrong comment above. The graph starts correctly at 1985 and has 5 year intervals. So the label '1980' should read '1990'. Phew!