I think the comparison to heroin is unhelpful for a start. People who are inclined to dismiss your concerns are given ammunition from the title alone, because i

I think the comparison to heroin is unhelpful for a start. People who are inclined to dismiss your concerns are given ammunition from the title alone, because it is after all, wildly hyperbolic. Then the first half of your piece is equal parts ahistoric and overly dramatic. Trying to associate social media with heroin and cocaine is a bad idea, it’s easily dismissed. While social media can be addictive, it’s nothing compared to either drug mentioned. People are not dropping out of life and into homelessness, crime, and an early grave because of FaceBook. Facebook is a good thing to avoid, it monetizes you, abuses you, and wastes your time. It’s still nothing like heroin or cocaine. Facebook and social media are unpleasant and lead to some really bizarre behavior, but I’m yet to hear of people losing their families and lives over it on anything like the regularity you’d expect from a peer of hard drugs. Social media, imo, tends to lead to a more homogenous and boring type of interaction, but again if that’s all you got from heroin it wouldn’t be the problem it is. Beyond that you lionize a time you clearly don’t know much about. Music went from being something where you actively paid close attention to a complex piece of art to just another sound in your environment. Music is all around us now – though we take it completely for granted. This may shock you, but there was never this time period of attentive bliss you describe. There was a lot of shitty music, ubiquitous and talentless buskers and amateurs, and the equivalent of pop music. Of course very little of that survives today, because we’ve selected for the most virtuoso, most entertaining and most memorable pieces of music from the past. Many people also really appreciate music today, and you simply gloss over them as if they didn’t exist. Reading your piece reminds me of people who think that disposable crap is a new invention, instead of realizing the survivorship bias inherent in that perspective. The disposable crap was disposed of while the bulletproof appliances and such, remain. That doesn’t mean that cheap blenders or clothing was just invented however, far from it. Instead of pearl clutching about a past that never existed as a motivation to discover a conscience, there are more pressing issues with tech. The immense amount of trash production and wasted energy is a problem, along with planned obsolescence. Something like Bitcoin which exists to enrich a few at the expense of burning energy wastefully is a problem. Treating people like guinea pigs for fun and profit, marketing gambling for children, hoovering up every iota of personal information and then storing it until it inevitably leaks is a problem. The transition of manned to unmanned combat is a huge problem. There are so many real, pressing concerns that require programmers to grow a conscience and some empathy, that histrionics about a lost past that never was feels like a self-serving distraction.