3 ms·
Mind you, that's a JPG you are editing, so in the 8 bit sRGB color space. That means manipulations can lead to errors and illusions due to the color space being
by vanderZwan 8y ago
Mind you, that's a JPG you are editing, so in the 8 bit sRGB color space. That means manipulations can lead to errors and illusions due to the color space being non-linear and clipped[0].
The original data was likely linear and at a much higher precision. If the source was a 16 bit linear grayscale PNG for example you could be much more assured you're not seeing the effects of JPG compression and things that were actually measured.
EDIT: Found better sources:
16-bit sRGB PNG: https://eventhorizontelescope.org/files/eht/files/20190410-78m-4000x2330.png?m=1554877782 https://eventhorizontelescope.org/files/eht/files/20190410-7...
180 MiB original TIFF: https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1907a/ https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1907a/
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKnqECcg6Gw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKnqECcg6Gw
- localhostdotdev 8y agoThanks a lot for the explanation and the better sources, the TIFF image should probably be a torrent because it's not downloading very fast, the PNG image does give much nicer renders: https://i.imgur.com/zZcD5Na.jpg https://i.imgur.com/zZcD5Na.jpg