5 ms·
MASSSIVELY UNDERWHELMING As a person who has no interest in these intergalactic shenanigans, it looks just like another ball on fire. I wanted to be excited, I
by chirau 8y ago
MASSSIVELY UNDERWHELMING
As a person who has no interest in these intergalactic shenanigans, it looks just like another ball on fire. I wanted to be excited, I really was, but this is just another picture.
A giant leap for mankind, and i fully recognize that, but the awe... nada. It's just another picture really. There is nothing fascinating about it.
Hats off to the people who brought this to us though. I know gravity of the matter and how daunting a task it was. Keep on!
- jazzyjackson 8y agoIf it fails to pique your interest, oh well, but the more you read about black holes and what is observable about them, the stranger it feels to be looking at it face to face.
- ttul 8y agoPerhaps consider this: "VLBI allows the EHT to achieve an angular resolution of 20 micro-arcseconds — enough to read a newspaper in New York from a sidewalk café in Paris [6]." What's surprising about this image is how utterly microscopic the thing is that was observed - from our location. The width of the event horizon is 40 billion kilometers. That's only 267x the diameter of our orbit around the Sun. But the M87 black hole is 26,000 light years away. 26,000 light years is 2.45979e+17 km, or 639,903,746,098 times farther away than the moon.
- phonypc 8y ago53 million light years. 26 thousand would still be in our own galaxy.
- ttul 8y agoQuite right. Thank you for the correction.
- chirau 8y agoI am fully aware of the theory and excitement over all this. I just expected something... different. I thought i'd be wowed by something new. It literally looks just like a regular photo. Is there a lot of context behind it? Sure. Is it a HUGE leap in our advancement? Definitely. Is it an eye-turning picture? NO. That is all. Black holes are fascinating, their picture simply isn't, for me at least.