2 ms·
I'm all for flagging the content. It'd be especially nice if it'd throw up a warning in front of the summary if enough people flag it. Digg does pretty well in
by spydez 18y ago
I'm all for flagging the content. It'd be especially nice if it'd throw up a warning in front of the summary if enough people flag it.
Digg does pretty well in this regard. If enough people bury the story as inaccurate, you see a big "Warning! The contents of this article may be inaccurate!". That plus scanning a few comments are helpful for deciding not to waste my time on an article.
Suggested flags include: 'inaccurate', 'nsfw', 'not suitable for HN', etc.