5 ms·
It's "pissing in the pool" for the rest of us. I know it feels validated internally because it worked out for you though. Even when I did a startup, I held pr
by goobynight 8y ago
It's "pissing in the pool" for the rest of us. I know it feels validated internally because it worked out for you though.
Even when I did a startup, I held pretty normal hours. Working on someone else's problem to make them rich is silly to me. I think it's something that you either get or you don't. I don't plan to convince you to change sides, but I'd 100% of the time rather spend hours 8 or 9 through 12 working on my own hard problems. They're easy to create. I definitely had more responsibility, did more coding, and felt more energy at a startup than a big corp though. Pay and nearly everything else was shit in comparison.
If someone did 10-12 hour regularly on my current team, we'd be pissed. It would set a new normal and management would think they could start replacing people until they get 10 of those guys that are willing to sit here half the day.
- landryraccoon 8y agoWait, I enjoy my job, want to write code and get lost in my work and you think that’s pissing in the pool? I know some people at work that sort of have your mindset. I think it’s the worst. Not only do they not want to help someone who’s passionate you now make me suspect they’re incentivized to undermine hard workers as well, since they make you look bad. Fine, take it easy at work, I don’t care. Just don’t make it harder for people who are trying to get work done.
- akoumis 8y agoYou are being exploited. Do you get compensated 1.5x your base for all those 12 hour work days?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- landryraccoon 8y agoMaking multiples of what the median American household makes, sitting in front of a computer, in an air conditioned office full of free food is being exploited? I'm sure a lot of American workers are being exploited but I'm not.
- toomuchtodo 8y agoSo you recognize the abuse disparity. Good! You can then understand why people fight against abuse despite the complaints from the comfortable.
- landryraccoon 8y agoI recognize that a lot of workers in America are exploited and abused. And I support policies to mitigate that. However, trying to associate myself with those or comparing my minor inconveniences to that of blue collar workers seems like it would be extremely spoiled and tone deaf given how exceptionally privileged the average tech worker is compared to blue collar workers.
- akoumis 8y agoAt most startups (with illiquid equity), TC adjusted for cost of living (assuming Bay Area) is probably not far from median American household. Employers take advantage of youthful zeal which prevents ICs from understanding their true worth to the business. After startup engineers reach the point where 12 hours days become unacceptable from a logistics standpoint (kids, burnout), what do they have to show other than enriching their founders? If they enjoy programming and would do it in their spare time, why not dedicate 8 hours towards their job and 4 hours towards a personal project with potentially much higher personal reward?
- landryraccoon 8y ago> what do they have to show other than enriching their founders? I don’t get it. Being debt free and having a big pile of money, and a body that still works since I haven’t been doing backbreaking manual labor?
- phamilton 8y agoOn salary (not hourly) this is a useless question. Say they make 100k/yr. With 40hr weeks that's roughly $50/hr. With 60 hour weeks and 1.5x base pay, you could say it's $20/hr. It's all the same. What you seem to be asking for is for companies to pay you the same, just say your base is lower so they can pay you 1.5x you base for appearances sake. Now, optics aside, if you take an offer with an expectation of 40 hrs / week and they make you work 60, then sure. That's exploitation. But if the expectations are clear upfront, "base pay" is just legalese.
- akoumis 8y agoMaybe I can rephrase. Is OP's base 1.5x that of the average (8 hr/day) worker base at comparable companies?
- goobynight 7y agoI want you to work hard, I just need you to be paid more (hopefully a lot!). I'm saying it's better if I'm paid less than you. What I don't want is for you to put in more effort for the same pay and establish a "new normal". That's all it takes for us both to be happy. I don't want to hold you back, m'dude.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- ohaideredevs 8y agoI don't think it sets the normal. We had a great senior dev who never worked a second past 8 hours, never did prod support during off hours, never picked up the phone on the weekend, etc. But when he did work, he delivered way more than the junior devs did. He works there to this day, at a great salary, with no pressure to work OT.
- refurb 8y agoSorry, but that's ridiculous. People have different levels of dedication to their work. If you want to do 40 hours a week, that's fine, but don't crap on someone who wants to put in more effort. Sounds like a union where they'd beat on the new guy who actually tried to be more efficient.
- toomuchtodo 8y agoVersus management demanding everyone work 50-60 hours a week in an at will employment state? I won’t disparage your work ethic, but recognize that allowing yourself to be exploited enables your company to more easily exploit the unwilling, and without labor protections, it leads to systemic employee abuse. You can’t say it doesn’t happen. HN is littered with these abuse stories.
- ryanisnan 8y agoI get what you're saying, but don't try to act like working more is equivalent to being more efficient.