3 ms·
The thread is filled with other OMSCS students, so I may as well throw in my perspective as a grad. - The instruction quality is comparable to free online cour
by mrosett 8y ago
The thread is filled with other OMSCS students, so I may as well throw in my perspective as a grad.
- The instruction quality is comparable to free online courses (which is unsurprising since it's all delivered over Udacity anyway.)
- I learned a ton
- What Georgia Tech gets right is simple and a little sad: credentials matter. I learned a lot by going through a bunch of online courses and being graded, but a significant chunk of the value is just saying I have the degree. I wish that "I took a dozen MOOCs" carried the same weight as saying that you have an MS from a top-10 school, since in this case they really are exactly the same, but it doesn't. That's particularly true with arms-length interactions. Day-to-day my CEO cares more about the skills I picked up from the program, but when he's assembling slides about team for a pitch deck, the credential matters more.
Here's my full write-up:
http://writing.maxrosett.com/reflections-on-the-georgia-tech-online-ms-in-computer-science.html http://writing.maxrosett.com/reflections-on-the-georgia-tech...
Edit: Formatting
- alanfranz 8y ago> The instruction quality is comparable to free online courses IMHO: the instruction (video classes) is comparable to GOOD QUALITY online classes. There're a ton of shitty online content. And projects/exams are, IMHO, far harder. But YMMV.
- mrosett 8y agoThat's a good point. I haven't really come across bad online content, but that's probably because I've stuck to stuff coming out of top universities rather than random Udemy courses.