4 ms·
That's beside the point. If the argument is: "Emacs has better standardisation than Markdown" (which is what the article purports), that argument is invalid if
by lucideer 8y ago
That's beside the point. If the argument is: "Emacs has better standardisation than Markdown" (which is what the article purports), that argument is invalid if it depends on always using a single implementation. That's not how standards work.
i.e. If your answer to anyone's problem using Org is "what prevents you from using Emacs", then that ain't standardisation.
- kqr 8y agoI think we're in violent agreement. The submitted article mischaracterises the level of standardisation around the Org format. My comment was written with the intention of seeing if I could help with the specific problem the GP mentioned, since it seemed like the GP had overlooked a possible solution. I should have been more clear about that, sorry.