2 ms·
This comment gets posted on HN about every site that dares write about something with a small filesize and frankly it's getting a bit boring.
by skrebbel 8y ago
This comment gets posted on HN about every site that dares write about something with a small filesize and frankly it's getting a bit boring.
- enriquto 8y agoIt is not boring. It is sad.
- snorlaxle 8y agoI believe the criticism was fair here. The author specifically used "339 bytes" on the headline which implies a certain level of precision. Being orders of magnitude away from the claimed file size is not excusable. It just feels like click bait. Not counting imported CSS is simply wrong here. I can have a full-featured responsive CSS framework in <50 bytes if I @import bootstrap.css