3 ms·
I was going to argue why I think you are wrong but I am also not a lawer so instead, I will point out that IANAL comments in legal threads generally provide mor
by kristiandupont 16y ago
I was going to argue why I think you are wrong but I am also not a lawer so instead, I will point out that IANAL comments in legal threads generally provide more noise than signal. Maybe we should strive to avoid them?
- brlewis 16y agoA reply from a lawyer would be ideal, but since the rest of us are affected by the legal system, I do think some attempts to understand it are worthwhile. Here's a link to argue against me, but does it apply after the patent is granted, or only before? There's presumption of validity after. http://patents101.com/2009/03/date-of-invention-first-to-invent http://patents101.com/2009/03/date-of-invention-first-to-inv...
- stonemetal 16y agoWhat are your arguments? He is right the US is first to invent. I think he is wrong in the claim to have invented it earlier bit is easy, the repo commit time line(and mailing list emails etc.) would give a firm date which the claiming party would have to have proof of inventing before. That is to say it isn't like a criminal case where only one side has to prove anything both parties have to prove invention dates.