Why doesn't the article excerpt any language from the bill, or otherwise link to it? It's hard to imagine a bill that defines, to an enforceable legal standard

Why doesn't the article excerpt any language from the bill, or otherwise link to it? It's hard to imagine a bill that defines, to an enforceable legal standard, what is a dark pattern, and what is an addictive game (another thing that the article mentions is banned). EDIT: Thanks to sbov (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19620441 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19620441) for doing the legwork the news isn't doing and digging up the text. It doesn't seem to mention addictive games at all; maybe that's another bill?