4 ms·
You can keep the rhythm and still fill the monitor by using multiple columns. Newspapers do it.
by megous 8y ago
You can keep the rhythm and still fill the monitor by using multiple columns. Newspapers do it.
- kqr 8y agoHow do you flow text from one column to the next, using as many columns as there is room for?
- megous 8y agoCSS column.
- kqr 8y agoI'll be damned. I did not expect browser support for that to be as good as it is: https://caniuse.com/#search=column https://caniuse.com/#search=column
- Eiriksmal 8y agokqr, there are a lot of usability problems that come from stretching columns across the screen. There's a thread talking around some of them here on this post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19621284 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19621284 My thinking is that most programmers love information-dense displays. But designers have shown that empty space is vital to creating a truly usable design. If a website used some minor CSS to add a bit more line-height and slightly-larger font than most browsers ship with, then fills 3840 pixels with wall-to-wall-text, you'll successfully achieve the most information-dense possible site, but utterly sacrifice readability. Again, I don't think it's accidental that books don't use multiple columns of 66 characters in a landscape-style aspect ratio. In true HN fashion, commenters are searching for a local maximum (use more of my big monitor) that defies how ordinary people interact with the written word. :)
- kqr 8y agoThank you for the kind advice. Don't worry, I won't use it on any sort of content-heavy websites!