3 ms·
It's worth noting that Clayton has a much more thorough, mathematical response to Taleb's paper (written back in November): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tQj
by baron_harkonnen 8y ago
It's worth noting that Clayton has a much more thorough, mathematical response to Taleb's paper (written back in November): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tQj4ZGja6jKADJGiFj-dcQAirWoUFX46/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tQj4ZGja6jKADJGiFj-dcQAirWo...
Since Taleb delights in make his mathematical writing as opaque as possible, it's a useful read in just to know exactly the claims that Taleb is making in his paper.
- thanatropism 8y agoBy that link's characterization Taleb's argument is pure fluff.