4 ms·
I don't understand. You either think it's legitimate to call out bad behavior (US or Chinese) or you think doing so is disingenuous pearl-clutching. Is it only
by saas_sam 8y ago
I don't understand. You either think it's legitimate to call out bad behavior (US or Chinese) or you think doing so is disingenuous pearl-clutching. Is it only pearl-clutching when it's about the far worse behavior of the Chinese gov't? Or are you advocating for a constant apologizing for US misdeeds any time another countries' misdeeds are raised, even if that other countries' are far worse...?
- ska 8y agoOr are you advocating for a constant apologizing for US misdeeds any time another countries' misdeeds are raised, even if that other countries' are far worse...? Actually I'd rather we avoid the whole pointless whataboutism exercise if we can. Again, it's not either or. The originating comment was claiming that some of the news about Huawei is being driven by very different motivations (I think it was trade war fallout), and being stated in disingenuous ways. And yes, there seems a lot of pearl clutching going on right now about vaguely defined Chinese technology threats. As well as some very real concerns about Nation-state actors in this space, China in particular. That seems worth at least questioning. What I am saying is that it is perfectly consistent to hold the mixture of views that the Chinese government is doing some really bad things with privacy and personal data, that the US government also does some really bad things with privacy and personal data (though not nearly as many as Chinese govt) and that some of what is being propagated in the media currently against companies like Huawei has very little to do with these things but rather is based more on domestic economic interests. I think it's fair to call that last part out, without it devolving into a bunch of whataboutism on the former. Agree that particular poster could have worded things better, but they had a (valid, I think) point.