3 ms·
It is maintained, but not actively. Like the last year there was two issues fixed in it. There isn't someone actively trying to enhance it or add more features
by didibus 8y ago
It is maintained, but not actively. Like the last year there was two issues fixed in it.
There isn't someone actively trying to enhance it or add more features to it.
So my understanding is only major issues gets addressed.
- siscia 8y agoWhich is a quite peculiar and reccurrent pattern in closure. After a while libraries and tools stabilize and the community just maintains it.
- jakeinspace 8y agoMost Clojure libraries I've worked with, even the "larger" ones, are fairly small and concise by modern standards. I wonder if this has something to do with the lack of activity (in addition to being a small community). It feels a bit like the Unix philosophy - lots of small/medium libraries handling discrete problems, rather than many competing mega-frameworks. To me, this feels like a silver lining that comes from the limitations of a smaller dev community.
- tombert 8y agoThis is why I love functional programming as a whole. I feel like my code is really terse, without little/no sacrifices in expressivity, and usually no substantial sacrifice in performance.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- vnorilo 8y agoTo me, that sounds like a Good Thing.