3 ms·
I prefer to have features like this in core so I don't have to give a ton of permissions to a third party. I hope it becomes powerful enough to replace uMatrix.
by meruru 8y ago
I prefer to have features like this in core so I don't have to give a ton of permissions to a third party. I hope it becomes powerful enough to replace uMatrix.
- founderling 8y agoExtensions are analyzed by the Firefox team: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/AMO/Policy/Reviews#Submission_Guidelines https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/AMO... If the review process is still insecure (That is how I understand you reply) I would prefer them to put their energy into this. Analyzing popular extensions in depth (and giving them some 'in depth analyzed' badge) so you do not have to trust a third party.
- meruru 8y agoI don't know how much I can trust the review process. I believe they have relaxed it a bit recently: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/09/21/review-wait-times-get-shorter/ https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/09/21/review-wait-times... >Add-ons built on the WebExtensions API will now be automatically reviewed. This means we will publish add-ons shortly after uploading. Human reviewers will look at these pre-approved add-ons, prioritized on various risk factors that are calculated from the add-on’s codebase and other metadata.