> I’m not sure what this is adding really. Research doesn't need to be ground breaking to be useful. A course like the one described in the article can be a h

> I’m not sure what this is adding really. Research doesn't need to be ground breaking to be useful. A course like the one described in the article can be a helpful resource to women (and men) discouraged from engineering because of difficulty with spacial reasoning. > I think this obsession with trying to find that everything and everyone is equal That's actually not what the article is about. It pretty much says up front that the woman who designed the course had difficulty with spacial reasoning, as many women do. She got better with practice. Stories like these are valuable to people who believe that innate difference cannot be overcome. We should think of these abilities less like height, which changes very little after adulthood, and more like strength, which can be improved with practice and effort.