> F5 Networks should have been branded a black sheep for its various TLS implementation screw ups (they are the prime reason TLSv1 is considered insecure), yet

> F5 Networks should have been branded a black sheep for its various TLS implementation screw ups (they are the prime reason TLSv1 is considered insecure), yet they came out mostly unscathed. I'm failing to find more information (googling for ssl issues on ssl termination equipment doesn't work well,) though it sounds like it'd be a good read - if you have any more details to share, please...