4 ms·
This is a good and comprehensive article. You and the grandparent comment are focusing on one minor component and using it to raise FUD about the rest of the ar
by et2o 8y ago
This is a good and comprehensive article. You and the grandparent comment are focusing on one minor component and using it to raise FUD about the rest of the article and indeed the entire NYT now. It's a lazy form of debate. HN used to be better than this.
- huffmsa 8y agoI'm just providing facts. NYT fired a ton of editors, because they're expensive.[1] They've also hired younger, cheaper writers. As a result, the overall quality of the product has fallen, noticeable. [1] https://www.google.com/amp/s/deadline.com/2017/06/new-york-times-editors-decry-humiliating-layoffs-1202121627/amp/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/deadline.com/2017/06/new-york-t...
- CivBase 8y agoI never said the article was bad. I said the title was bad and specifically addressed the complaint in the title which brought me to the article in the first place.