4 ms·
I wonder if premiums are higher for women due to increased likelihood of just becoming a housewife and providing no income? Correct me if I’m wrong but the ane
by b_tterc_p 8y ago
I wonder if premiums are higher for women due to increased likelihood of just becoming a housewife and providing no income?
Correct me if I’m wrong but the anecdote in the front is also a much worse deal than the table later on. 279/month = 3,348/year. Thats 6.7% of her 50k salary, which is before tax to begin with.
Tons of other loopholes I’m curious about. Like salary vs other comp?
- saint_fiasco 8y agoIf they are going to be cynical about it, maybe they should consider household income instead of just personal salary so they can collect from women who, due to higher education, can marry a richer husband than they could without the education.
- b_tterc_p 8y agoI don’t think that could be enforceable. It would also create weird incentives. If two people have these loans, and they get married... would their payments double?
- dsfyu404ed 8y agoIt would be hilariously unenforceable because people would just put off getting married on paper until the term of the payments is up. For couples with highly disparate incomes people already do this to take advantage of income caps for state provided healthcare.