> To be fair the article doesn't critique using 1990s (or earlier) hardware/software. I actually edited in an extra paragraph at the end of my original post be

> To be fair the article doesn't critique using 1990s (or earlier) hardware/software. I actually edited in an extra paragraph at the end of my original post because I wanted to at least credit the author for talking more about design issues than "processing power" in the body of the article. The title is very bad, though.