3 ms·
"No, correlation does not imply causation, but it sure as hell provides a hint." https://slate.com/technology/2012/10/correlation-does-not-imply-causation-how-t
by tuxracer 8y ago
"No, correlation does not imply causation, but it sure as hell provides a hint." https://slate.com/technology/2012/10/correlation-does-not-imply-causation-how-the-internet-fell-in-love-with-a-stats-class-cliche.html https://slate.com/technology/2012/10/correlation-does-not-im...
> I would argue that the bacteria shows up AFTER the body has been damaged through...an overload of toxins
Not sure what this is based on. What does "toxins" even mean in this context?
- tasty_freeze 8y agoWhen this comes up, my stock answer is: No, correlation is not causation, but it is correlated with causation.