2 ms·
It makes the electoral college redundant, which it is intended to do. This is a work around instead of a constitutional amendment to remove the electoral colleg
by erentz 8y ago
It makes the electoral college redundant, which it is intended to do. This is a work around instead of a constitutional amendment to remove the electoral college because that would be very difficult.
Landslides aren’t a bad thing if that’s what people want. I’m not sure why you phrased it as if they were.
The ideal would be for national popular vote using an instant runoff system (single transferable vote or ranked choice voting).
In lieu of that the next best is plain first past the post with popular vote which this would gives when it reaches the required number. Now that way no matter where you live in the country your vote will still count. At the moment if you’re a blue voter in a predominantly red state or vice versa there is no reason for you to leave the house on Election Day. Under this system your vote still matters so you have a reason to cast it.
More importantly presidential politics stops being beholden to the wishes of a minority in a few swing states and now has to consider the wishes of the whole national population everywhere.
- xvedejas 8y agoInstant runoff voting is not obviously better than the current system, and in fact it might be worse. Not only does it still have issues with "vote splitting", it also has a property called non-monotonicity. This means you can hurt a candidate by ranking them higher, or help a candidate by ranking them lower. I find this to be a fairly dishonorable voting system to implement. If you want voting systems without these issues, you need range voting or condorcet voting.