5 ms·
This model needs to evolve from “you must sign with Apple” to “you must sign with one of $TRUSTED_LIST”. There should be a (non-trivial) way to set this, and i
by makecheck 7y ago
This model needs to evolve from “you must sign with Apple” to “you must sign with one of $TRUSTED_LIST”. There should be a (non-trivial) way to set this, and if I decide all software signed by my best friend is OK then I should have that option. Grandmas should be able to trust software from their IT-expert grandsons and so forth.
There is value in requiring all software to be validated by somebody but it’s a slippery slope to have ONE. The main reason is, even if I trust “Apple” now, what is “Apple” in 10 years? (Heck I thought I “trusted” them to always make desirable hardware, got burned on that one.) Things change. I want another signatory.
- _wmd 7y agoThis is literally how code signing worked for Windows. Unsurprisingly signed malware has been far from uncommon
- 6nf 7y agoThere's been issues with code signing but you can't say it's been pointless. It's a significant hoop to jump for malware writers and out of reach for basic script kiddies.
- jake_the_third 7y agoThis is literally also how cert signing works for tls. Unsurprisingly miss-issued certs have been far from common. This model can work. It's just that microsoft is being sloppy.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- swiftcoder 7y agoMis-issued certs are common enough that Google et al had to force Symantec out of the cert issuing business. It's a model that only works with a monopolistic cartel gatekeeping the ability to issue certs (which is basically Apple's role in this scenario).
- realusername 7y ago> Unsurprisingly signed malware has been far from uncommon Malware is very common on the Play store as well, signed software by one gatekeeper does not guarantee anything.
- danielrhodes 7y agoHow does what you are proposing increase trust for consumers? I think that when you look at how things went for the certificate business, you will find this model pretty quickly turns into a pretty scammy breed of companies offering "notary" services without a lot of benefit to consumers. Consumers would have to know which authorities were trustworthy, and since most won't care/know, it results in lower security overall. Now if the App Store were decentralized, I think things would be a lot different. But Apple already owns things end-to-end, so they may as well be the certificate authority as well.